July 2008

Home

Squire Value Picks

Squire Cellar Picks

Retailer Directory

Industry Resources

Feature Articles
Current Features
 
2002 Index
 
2001 Index
 
2000 Index
 

...Search

WineSquire Mail
  Join our mailing list and receive our monthly lists by email. View archive.  
Highlights
Feedback
Questions? Comments?
  Email us
Feature Article
Home > Articles > Article  - Published April 2002
Regulating Wine
Courtesy of 30 Second Wine Advisor
By Robin Garr

Generally speaking, I don't object to reasonable efforts to regulate industry on behalf of consumers.

But a recent announcement from the U.S. Treasury Department's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), the agency charged with overseeing wine labeling in the United States, seems to represent the kind of regulatory thinking that brought us auto-windshield shades imprinted with the warning "don't drive while using this thing."

Apparently concerned that consumers might be confused, ATF has declared it illegal to label a wine as "effervescent" ... if it doesn't have bubbles.

"As you may be aware," the agency wrote in an April 5 statement, federal regulation "prohibit any person from representing any still wine as an effervescent wine, or as a substitute for an effervescent wine."

This might seem to go without saying, but to ensure that there's no misunderstanding, regulators have come up with a specific list of terms that may not appear on still (non-sparkling) wines: Petillant, Spumante, Perlant, Frizzante, Spritz/Spritzy, Bubble/Bubbly, Sparkle/Sparkling, Tingle/Tingly, Cremant and Crackling, with a marginal note warning, "This is not an all- inclusive list."

(This is actually a pretty good international glossary of terms for wines with varying degrees of carbonation, although it was somewhat flawed by the inclusion of "Reciotto," an apparently mispelled variation on the Italian "Recioto," a word that has absolutely nothing to do with sparkling wine. I've asked ATF for clarification on this - if they respond to my E-mail, I'll pass it along.)

Finally, the regulators point out that the term "lively," which in the past was on the list of banned terms, is now permissible on still-wine labels - subject to permission being given on a case-by-case basis, "provided that it is not used in such a way that it is likely to mislead consumers to believe that the wine is effervescent."

I hope you are as reassured as I am to learn that the regulators are watching out for our best interests.

If you would like to read the full text of the ATF news release, it's online at http://www.atf.treas.gov/press/industry/fy02/040502labelingupdate.htm
 

Robin Garr is the creator of the WineLover's Page.
Send email to Robin Garr.

Ask the Squire

Questions and 
answers
about wine.

 

Local Wine Personalities
Tom Allan
Eric Awes
Sean Boyd
Andrew Campbell
Stephen Carroll
Doug Charles
Marco D'Ambrosio
Tom DiNardo
Mark Elwell
Jameson Fink
Chris Gorman
Amy Grape
Kathy Kongelbak
Jake Kosseff
Dawn Marti
Rowena Saturay
John Schultz
Lars Sorensen
Jens Strecker
Olé Thompson
Nick Tomassi
Kenneth Winch

If you would like to contribute, please contact us.
 
WineSquire Links
Check out the sites that have received the WineSquire 'Seal of Approval.'

Home | Squire Value Picks | Squire Cellar Picks | Retailer Directory | Industry Resources | Search
Articles | People | Products | Books | Links
About Us | Sponsors | Advertise with Us
 

Privacy Policy
Copyright 1999-2008  WineSquire.com.  All Rights Reserved.