|
|
 |
|
Feature
Article |
|
|
Home
> Articles > Article -
Published August 2005 |
|
|
Mondovino: Shaky, not Stirring
Courtesy of Dr. Vino
Wine Politics
How does wine get made? How does wine make its way from the vineyard
to our table? What seems like a straightforward tale is in fact one
full of politics. In a series of postings, I examine who gets what,
when and how in the world of wine.
View archives
Mondovino: shaky, not stirring
Documentaries analyze social reality. If you want hard core
social (or political or economic) analysis—you know, with data and
theory—turn to academia. Even though they have nowhere near the
amount of viewers as feature films, documentaries do however attract
a larger audience than academia while being a similar sort of
endeavor. So it was with great relish that I went to see Mondovino,
the controversial new documentary about globalization in the wine
world that opened in March in New York and rolls out in small movie
houses across the country over the next few weeks.
If the film were a paper from one of my political science
students, I would have returned it with lots of red ink in the
margins. "AWK" (awkward!), "elaborate further," "need stronger
intro," "redundant" might be things that I would scrawl. I will save
my grade for the end of this review.
|
|
|
Though the documentary has some wonderfully candid moments of
wine world luminaries, it remains scattershot in its argument and
jiggly in its camerawork thanks to the camera's midriff location on
the cameraman. Though this film has been compared to Michael |
 |
|
|
Moore's documentaries for the similar styles of pamphleteering,
Moore remains light years ahead of director Jonathan Nossiter in terms of
coherence, presentation of argument, use of music and overall
rhythm—not to mention humor.
If Nossiter could have clearly articulated his argument it would
have run something like this: greater globalization in the wine
trade, including corporations, critics and traveling consultants,
has lead to a homogenization of wines that robs them of a sense of
place. In short, brand equals bland. A voiceover narrative would
have helped articulate this more clearly but instead Nossiter relies
on suggestion, the fast edit, or worse, vague innuendo, to merely
suggest his thesis.
It is the great fear of all wine geeks that we will be banished
forever to a future of bland wines. But there is also the
possibility that corporations with deep pockets will use profits
from low-end wines to subsidize the production of profound high-end
wines. Or that committed enthusiasts will start small, craft
wineries. Certainly Champagne houses have shown that brands are not
necessarily bland and can work will at the high-end. Premium wines
are the fastest growing category in the drinks business after all
and competition is fierce.
The evidence that Nossiter provides to support his claim fits
about as well as 12 bottles of bulky Turley fit in a regular wine
case. To start, the Mondavi Corporation serves as the main lens for
his tale of the perils of globalization. This is problematic because
Robert Mondavi has done much more good than harm for the California
wine industry-and the creation of a wine and food culture in
America, soon to be the largest market for wine consumption in the
world. Further, the corporation's financial and management problems
brought it to its own demise as Constellation bought the company
last fall.
|
|
|
Similarly, Robert Parker and Michel Rolland have contributed to
globalization in their roles as all-powerful wine critic and "flying
winemaker" respectively. But the wines that they advocate are
"hedonistic fruit bombs" - anything but bland! Sure, some could quip
that Parker's palate is tired or |
Mondovino's Axis of Evil |
|
|
Rolland's apparent obsession with the one-size-fits-all solution
of "micro-oxygenization" is too much,
but net-net these global players have done a lot to raise the
quality of wine around the world, not to lower it.
Certainly if one were crudely carving up the wine world into good
and evil, American wine wholesalers would be an easy target even
though they do not figure in the film. As consolidation of this
middle tier of distribution means that the players become more
focused on the products of big companies (to wit, Diageo, the
largest drinks firm in the world now insists that its wholesalers
have exclusive sales teams dedicated to their products). Do Florida
consumers have access to the wines of Nossiter's folk heroes, from
Sicily or Guibert from Languedoc? Probably not. In this light,
Parker and his ratings are entirely optional; whether a wine is
available at the local store is not.
In the end, all papers must get a grade and I give this movie a
C-. (For those of you who finished your formal education long ago,
grade inflation has made C- the new F.) Nossiter appears to have
many raw talents such as his ability to conduct interviews in
idiomatic English, French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. The
topic is fascinating and important and very amenable to the camera
lens. And even the argument may be salvageable with more thorough
evidence and less repetition. I'll consider this a rough draft.
Check for local release dates
here.
|
|
|
Reactions? Send an email!
photo 1: ThinkFilm
Photo 2: Dr. Vino
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, Dr. Vino is a real doctor..
Learn more about him at
www.drvino.net. |
|
|
|
 |
|
WineSquire
Links |
|
|
Check out the sites that have received the WineSquire 'Seal of Approval.'
|
|
|
|